Clemens Vasters presents his case on the idea that “free software” is a lie, and responds to an opposing opinion.

Both posts can be very thought–provoking, as it presents life’s simple realities in relation to the development of “free software.” Matthew Mastracci‘s reply is equally intriguing, and he elaborates on it even more.

A very good debate, but Matt fails to address what I think Clemens really is trying to say—you cannot live on free software alone.